I followed a bus home this morning with this advertisement on
the back: “ANSWER YOUR DOOR WITH YOUR CELL PHONE.” I thought: Is this the epitome of laziness? Are we no
longer expected to bother going to the door to peep out or greet someone in
person?
When I first noticed the ad, I pictured the homeowner deciding
from the couch whether to “unlock external device” remotely with his phone, but
perhaps this gimmick is designed to be used away from home. After all, a traveler
can now start a car parked in the airport lot before she gets off the plane. I
suppose we could answer our door from the doctor’s office or a bar, too, but
why would we?
Maybe I’m missing some vital point. The photo in the ad
showed a man waiting outside an entry door. I can understand wanting to know
who is ringing the doorbell, even if you don’t live in a questionable
neighborhood or haven’t been victimized in the past. I live in a safe area, but
I keep my doors locked whether or not I am home.
If answering your door is the stupidest use of a cell phone
yet, then checking in at the airport while you are still at home is the most
ridiculous use of the Internet. You can go online and check in to avoid those
pesky lines at the terminal, and I’m sure many people do it; but, as Tina
Turner said near the beginning of “Proud Mary,” “There’s just one thing.” You aren’t there.
How do you know you won’t get a flat tire on the way to the airport, end up
by the side of the road wailing for help like the GEICO Gecko, and miss your
flight? You don’t.
I do try to keep up with technology, but we all have to make
choices. For me it makes sense to ignore some high-tech applications. If you ring my doorbell, I'll still answer it in person.